This article is also available in 简体中文.
Quick answer: Work the five steps in order. (1) Pick the APO objective from the smallest feature you must resolve: resolution ≈ 0.61λ/NA at λ ≈ 0.55 μm, so NA 0.055 rates 5 μm and NA 0.42 rates 1 μm. (2) Size the field of view: on a 2/3″ sensor (8.8 × 6.6 mm) a 1.4× stack frames 6.3 × 4.7 mm and a 9× stack frames 0.98 × 0.73 mm. (3) Match the sensor to a TV tube: 1″ needs ≥1×, 4/3″ needs ≥1.5×, φ32 mm needs 2×. (4) Decide your vignetting acceptance at the low end, where the lit field measured 1774 px — 72.5% of the sensor width — with corners at zero. (5) Ask for verified data: no official zoom+APO combination table exists, so every combination value here is computed by multiplication, not yet verified for this combination.
A continuous zoom lens plus an APO (apochromatic) objective gives one stack that spans a board-level overview to sub-micron detail. The two halves are specified separately, and the combination between them is where selection most often goes wrong. This checklist turns the choice into five ordered questions, each with a number to check before moving on.
The numerical aperture (NA) of the objective, not the zoom ratio, decides what the system can resolve. The working relation is resolution ≈ 0.61λ/NA with λ ≈ 0.55 μm. Read it backwards from the smallest feature you must see, then confirm against the MPO objective range:
| Objective | NA | Working distance | Resolution | Depth of field |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2× | 0.055 | 34.6 mm | 5 μm | 91 μm |
| 5× | 0.14 | 45 mm | 2 μm | 14 μm |
| 10× | 0.28 | 34 mm | 1 μm | 3.5 μm |
| 20× | 0.29 | 30.8 mm | 0.7 μm | 3.5 μm |
| 50× | 0.42 | 20.5 mm | 1 μm | 1.6 μm |
Two traps. Working distance is not monotonic: the 5× objective has the longest WD at 45 mm, while the 50× works at 20.5 mm, so stand-off and resolution can conflict. And a 1 μm feature is not automatically resolved by a 1 μm objective — contrast, lighting and pixel sampling set the margin, so treat the rated number as a planning limit.
FOV = sensor dimension ÷ total magnification. On a 2/3″ sensor (8.8 × 6.6 mm), a 6.5X body with a 2× APO objective and a 1× TV tube (assumed) spans about 1.4×–9× — computed by multiplication, not yet verified for this combination — framing 6.3 × 4.7 mm at the low end and 0.98 × 0.73 mm at the high end. With a 5× objective the same body spans about 3.5×–22.5×, reaching 0.39 × 0.29 mm at 22.5×. The widest field you need fixes the low-magnification end; the zoom ratio then sets how far the detail end reaches.
The TV tube (camera adapter) magnifies the intermediate image onto the sensor; a tube too small for the sensor throws light outside the image circle. The 4K series boundary table states the limits plainly: a 1″ sensor needs ≥1×, a 4/3″ sensor needs ≥1.5×, and a φ32 mm sensor needs 2×, while combinations marked "----" are unsupported. Smaller formats (2/3″ and below) have more headroom than the listed minimums imply; from 1″ upward the tube magnification must be raised, and confirmed per model.
Vignetting — corner shading — is a low-magnification problem: that is where the field of view is widest relative to the usable image circle. Internal measurements (April 2026, 2448 × 2048, 2/3″-class camera) put numbers on it: at the low-magnification end of one tested combination, the illuminated field formed a 1774 px circle — 72.5% of the sensor width, 78.6% of its diagonal — centred within 50 px of the sensor centre, with corners at 0 (−100%). Raising the magnification restored the corners and removed the hard circular edge, narrowing the corner-to-centre gap to about −82%. The manufacturer's chart agrees in pattern: roughly 18 cells carry the bracketed note meaning "vignetting in actual use at this magnification," all at the low-magnification end — wide-angle attachment lenses (0.25×–0.75×, within the 0.25×–2× range) on a 2/3″ sensor behind a 0.5× adapter — while the 1/3″ column carries no marks. Two limits apply: the measured images were not tagged with a magnification or combination, so the result describes that tested combination only, and no zoom+APO combination has been measured — a claim that vignetting eases above 2× holds only where it has been verified. Your decision is a policy, not a number: for overview tasks a dark corner is often acceptable, for photometric or edge-critical measurement it is not.
No official zoom+APO combination table exists — no FOV, MTF or vignetting figures are published for these stacks — so every combination value here is computed by multiplication, not yet verified for this combination. Before you commit, request, for your exact stack (zoom body + tube + objective + camera): a FOV table at both zoom extremes; a flat-field or sample image at the lowest magnification you will use; the parfocality (focus-hold) behaviour when objectives are swapped, since the APO objectives are finite-conjugate and their matching to each platform is not published; and the objective mounting interface for your body. Treat the combination as an engineering claim to be verified, not a catalogue number to be copied.
| Step | What you confirm | What to ask the manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Feature size → objective NA | Smallest detail to resolve vs NA (resolution ≈ 0.61λ/NA) | Objective NA, resolution and WD for the required feature size |
| 2. Field of view → magnification span | Widest FOV needed; zoom range that reaches the detail end | FOV at both zoom extremes for your sensor, with values verified |
| 3. Sensor → TV tube | Sensor format vs minimum tube (1″ ≥1×, 4/3″ ≥1.5×, φ32 mm 2×) | Confirmed minimum tube and image-circle data for your sensor |
| 4. Vignetting acceptance | Whether corners are used, and at which magnification | A flat-field or sample image at your lowest working magnification |
| 5. Verified combination data | Whether the stack is a verified configuration | Combination FOV/vignetting sheet; parfocality and interface confirmation |
Related reading: the main guide to zoom + APO magnification and vignetting explains the optics behind these steps, and the motorized zoom lens selection guide covers body families, control and integration. The LZ-650104 motorized zoom lens (0.7×–4.5×, 6.5:1, WD 82±2 mm) is the 6.5X body used above.
Have your feature size, sensor format and working-distance budget ready, and contact POMEAS — we will return a recommendation with the verification data for your exact stack.
Simply enter your email to receive the latest news and insights from Pomeas. Stay connected with Pomeas and be the first to discover new innovations in optical excellence.