POMEAS optical applications team · Reviewed by Tiger Xie · Published 2026-10-16
Comparisons matter when two options are both technically valid and the decision turns on cost, cycle time or expected accuracy. The pages below put the alternatives side by side on published data and name the conditions under which each one wins.
Where a comparison depends on a fact that no party publishes, such as measured accuracy on a specific part, the article says so instead of asserting a winner.
Find the comparison that matches the decision you actually face. If two entries both seem to apply, read the one whose decision comes earlier in the project, because later choices depend on earlier ones.
No. It is more tolerant of working distance variation, which is a different property. A standard lens can be accurate in a fixture that holds the part at a fixed distance. Telecentric wins when the part height varies, when the field of view is small, or when measurement must not depend on focus.
Choose fixed focal when the field of view will not change: fewer moving parts, no repeatability question and a simpler integration. Choose zoom when one station must serve several part sizes or magnifications, and accept that magnification must be set repeatably and that brightness and depth of field move with it.
Manual when the setting is made once at commissioning and rarely touched. Motorised when magnification changes per product or per step, because a stored position repeats in a way a hand adjustment does not, and because it takes the operator out of the cycle.
No. Digital magnification enlarges pixels that were already captured and cannot recover detail the optics did not resolve. It is useful for display and for measuring features that are already resolved, and misleading if used to claim finer defect detection.
Compare object-side performance rather than sensor specifications: object-side pixel size, field of view after magnification, and whether the lens projects a usable image circle across the whole sensor. A larger sensor behind a mismatched lens can deliver fewer usable pixels than a smaller matched one.
In practice the working distance and field of view envelope, because the machine fixes it rather than the lens. Start there, then use these comparisons to choose within the options the envelope allows.
If two options both look viable, send the part, the tolerance and the constraints on working distance and cycle time. We can narrow it on the parameters that actually decide, rather than on specification tables.
Email: [email protected] | WhatsApp: +86 185 9810 2007
Reviewed by Tiger Xie.
Simply enter your email to receive the latest news and insights from Pomeas. Stay connected with Pomeas and be the first to discover new innovations in optical excellence.