The ferrule is the precision core of any fiber connector: a rigid body carrying one or more holes that hold the glass fiber at a defined position. Whether it is a ceramic single-fiber ferrule holding a 125 µm cladding (typical industry value) or a plastic multi-core housing whose coupling holes are tens of micrometers across, the holes decide where the fiber ends up — and the practical way to check them on a production line is to image them. This article sets out what a ferrule bore inspection has to deliver, how to size the optics for holes of this scale, and why backlight rather than epi-illumination is the working choice for bore geometry — illustrated with a real backlight image of a multi-core plastic ferrule.
Other languages: 中文 · Español · Français · Русский · العربية
A ferrule bore check is not one measurement but a short list of judgments, each with its own optical requirement:
The sampling rule for a judged edge is 3–5 pixels across the critical dimension. Centering to a stated accuracy needs more than the diameter rule suggests, because the center is derived from two contours: a useful working number is at least 3 pixels across the positioning tolerance itself.
Two worked cases show the range:
The required object-side magnification follows from the sensor: pixel size ÷ target µm-per-px. For the second case, 3.2 µm ÷ 0.75 ≈ 4.3X on the sensor. Where a continuous-zoom body is converted to an APO objective, remember the adapter factor: total magnification = zoom × APO objective × 0.55.
A bore is a hole. Its defining geometry is the boundary between material and opening, and the cleanest way to see that boundary is to put the light behind the part: the opening transmits, the body does not, and the hole appears as a bright disc on a dark body. Every geometric judgment — diameter, center, pitch, ovality — is read off that single contour.
The illumination quality decides whether that contour is stable. On translucent plastic, diffuse ring or area light creates a penumbra around the opening: the apparent edge shifts with brightness and part position, and the calculated center drifts cycle to cycle. The parallel backlight used in the project record has a half-angle below 0.1° and better than 90 % uniformity over the useful area, which keeps the gray transition at the rim narrow and repeatable — this is what makes sub-micrometer centering possible at all.
What plain backlight does not show: subsurface defects inside the material around the opening, and anything happening below the rim inside a blind hole. Those need a different illumination geometry or a destructive check — worth stating in the inspection plan rather than discovering on the line.
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Coupling hole diameter | 0.025 mm (25 µm) | Project record |
| Fiber diameter to be inserted | 0.020 mm (20 µm) | Project record |
| Positioning accuracy required | ≤ 1 µm | Project record |
| Working field of view | 7 mm | Project record |
| Sensor | 65 MP global-shutter CMOS, 3.2 µm pixel, 9344 × 7000 px | Product documentation |
| Illumination | Flat parallel backlight, half-angle < 0.1°, uniformity > 90 % | Product documentation |
| Resolution per pixel | ≈ 0.75 µm/px | Own calculation (estimate) |
The system imaged the hole with sharp edges and stable contrast, and guided the insertion mechanism within the ≤ 1 µm positioning requirement. The full solution write-up of this project is on our 0.025 mm fiber hole application page.
The working checklist is bore diameter and ovality, bore edge condition (burrs, chips, cracks), bore contamination or blockage, the center position of each hole for insertion guidance and pitch, and the concentricity between the bore center and the ferrule outer-diameter center. The last one is what actually positions the fiber inside the connector.
A bore is a hole, and its geometry is the boundary between material and opening. Backlight makes the opening transmit and the body stay dark, so the hole reads as a bright disc on a dark body with a single stable contour. Coaxial epi-illumination is the right tool for a fiber already seated in the end face, not for the bore geometry itself.
The sampling rule is 3–5 pixels across the critical dimension, but centering accuracy needs more: plan on at least 3 pixels across the positioning tolerance itself. In a documented case with a 0.025 mm hole, a 7 mm field of view on a 9344-pixel sensor gives about 0.75 µm per pixel — 33 pixels across the bore and about 3 pixels across the 2.5 µm side margin.
Total magnification = zoom magnification × APO objective magnification × 0.55, where 0.55 is the coupling factor of the APO adapter ring. Skipping the factor overstates magnification by nearly half and corrupts every field-of-view and pixel-size calculation built on it.
On translucent plastic, diffuse light creates a penumbra around the opening: the apparent edge shifts with brightness and part position, and the calculated center drifts from cycle to cycle. A parallel backlight with a half-angle below 0.1° keeps the gray transition at the rim narrow and repeatable, which is what makes sub-micrometer centering possible.
Yes, provided the field of view covers the bore and the ferrule outer diameter at the same time and the optics are telecentric. Concentricity is the distance between the two contour centers; if the outer diameter is out of frame, only the bore diameter and center can be judged.
Visible: rim burrs and chips, ovality, debris or plastic flash blocking the opening, and rim roughness at detail magnification. Not visible with plain backlight: subsurface defects in the material around the opening and anything below the rim inside a blind hole.
Yes. The camera images the rim of the hole, not the bottom. A through-hole under backlight shows the opening directly; a blind hole makes the depth part of the depth-of-field budget and usually needs illumination at an angle rather than straight backlight.
Simply enter your email to receive the latest news and insights from Pomeas. Stay connected with Pomeas and be the first to discover new innovations in optical excellence.