Numerical aperture describes the cone of light the lens accepts. On a fixed lens it is set by the aperture stop and does not change during use. On a motorized zoom lens the internal groups move to change magnification, and the effective cone changes with them.
The practical meaning is that a resolution or depth of field figure quoted for one zoom position does not describe the others. The lens has a range of behaviour, not a single specification.
Object-space resolution improves with numerical aperture, so the high-magnification end of the zoom normally resolves more detail — partly because of the magnification itself and partly because of the larger effective aperture at that position.
The two effects are hard to separate from the outside, which is why the useful check is empirical: image a resolution target at each magnification the recipe uses and record what is actually resolved, rather than deriving it from one quoted figure.
Depth of field falls as numerical aperture rises and as magnification rises, so the high-magnification end of a zoom lens has the least depth of field.
That is also the end where fixture errors are magnified most, so the tightest depth of field coincides with the tightest presentation requirement. A station validated at low magnification can fail at high magnification without anything having changed.
If the inspection uses more than one magnification, the exposure and the acceptance criteria must be established at each one rather than extrapolated from one.
Exposure differs because the effective aperture and the light distribution change with zoom. Acceptance criteria differ because the resolution and the depth of field change with it, so a threshold that is correct at one magnification can be either too tight or too loose at another.
Writing the recipe per position costs an hour during commissioning and prevents a class of intermittent failures that is very hard to diagnose later.
Ask for the numerical aperture, or the resolution and depth of field figures, at each magnification the application uses, not only at the one that appears in the brochure.
Ask also whether the figures were measured on the delivered unit or taken from a design model. For a zoom lens with moving groups, unit-to-unit adjustment matters, and the delivered-unit figure is the one that predicts performance.
A fixed lens has one numerical aperture and therefore one resolution and one depth of field. A zoom lens trades between them as it zooms, which is either the reason to use one or the reason not to.
Where the inspection needs two magnifications on the same station, that trade is a benefit and a motorized zoom avoids a lens change. Where it needs one magnification, a fixed lens gives a better result at that magnification for the same price.
No. The internal groups move to change magnification, so the effective cone changes with zoom position. Figures quoted for one position do not describe the others.
Normally the high-magnification end, because both the magnification and the effective aperture are larger there. The reliable answer for a specific unit comes from imaging a resolution target at each magnification used.
The high-magnification end. Depth of field falls as magnification and numerical aperture rise, so the end with the most detail also has the tightest height tolerance.
Usually not. The light reaching the sensor changes with the zoom position, so exposure has to be established per position. A single setting typically overexposes one end and underexposes the other.
Yes. Resolution and depth of field change with magnification, so a threshold that is correct at one position can be wrong at another. Validate at every magnification the recipe uses.
Ask for the magnifications the application actually uses, and ask whether the figures were measured on the delivered unit. For a zoom lens the unit-level figure is the one that predicts performance.
Simply enter your email to receive the latest news and insights from Pomeas. Stay connected with Pomeas and be the first to discover new innovations in optical excellence.