A conventional video measuring system moves the stage and the optics to each feature and measures sequentially. A flash measurement machine captures the entire field of view in a single exposure, then measures every dimension from that one image. The difference is not only speed: because all dimensions come from the same exposure, they are measured at the same instant, so thermal drift and vibration affect them consistently rather than progressively. This is why the technique suits batch inspection of small parts where many dimensions must be judged together.
The field of view is fixed by the optics and the sensor. A larger field captures more parts per shot but reduces the resolution available per part. The trade is direct: for a sensor of fixed pixel count, doubling the field halves the millimetres per pixel. This is the first decision in any specification, and it has to be made against the smallest tolerance in the drawing rather than against the part envelope.
A single-shot system cannot measure a feature on a face that is not visible from the camera direction. A bore wall, an undercut or a back face requires either a second view or a different sensor. It also cannot measure a feature smaller than its optical resolution no matter how the software is tuned. And because measurement is image-based, a feature whose edge contrast depends on lighting will move with lighting, so illumination stability becomes a metrology requirement rather than a convenience.
First, the smallest tolerance on the drawing against the field and resolution. Second, how many dimensions must be measured per part; the value of one-shot capture grows with feature count. Third, whether any dimension lies on a face not visible from above, which determines whether one station is enough. Fourth, the throughput requirement, which sets the exposure and handling budget. Fifth, traceability: how the system is calibrated and how that calibration is recorded.
Take a real part and its drawing. List every dimension that must be measured and mark which of them are visible from a single direction. If more than a small fraction are not, one-shot measurement will not cover the part regardless of field size. Then take the smallest tolerance and divide it by three; the result is the resolution the optics must deliver, and that number should be compared with the specification before any demonstration is booked.
Ask for repeatability on the same part measured twenty times without refixturing, and reproducibility on the same part refixtured twenty times. The first measures the system, the second measures the system plus the fixture, and it is the second number that predicts what happens in production. A supplier who can only show the first has not demonstrated the application.
A flash system captures the whole field in one exposure and measures all dimensions from that single image, instead of moving to each feature sequentially.
It means more parts per shot, but also fewer millimetres per pixel. The field must be chosen against the smallest tolerance, not the part envelope.
Not from a single direction. Features not visible from the camera axis need a second view or a different sensor.
Reproducibility includes refixturing, which is what happens in production. Repeatability alone measures the system, not the application.
Divide the smallest tolerance on the drawing by three. That gives the resolution the optics must deliver.
Yes. If edge contrast depends on lighting, the measured edge moves with lighting, so illumination stability is a metrology requirement.
Simply enter your email to receive the latest news and insights from Pomeas. Stay connected with Pomeas and be the first to discover new innovations in optical excellence.